Paper 1
■書誌情報
Guangqian Yang, Ye Du, Wenlong Hou, Qian Niu*, Shujun Wang*: PRA-PoE: Robust Multimodal Alzheimer’s Disease Classification under Arbitrary Modality Missingness, Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (MICCAI 2026), Early Accept, October 2026
■概要
Missing modalities are prevalent in real-world Alzheimer’s disease (AD) assessment and pose a significant challenge to multimodal learning, particularly when the distribution of observed modality subsets differs between training and deployment. Such missingness pattern mismatch induces a conditional representation shift across modality subsets. Existing approaches that rely on implicit imputation or modality synthesis often fail to explicitly model modality availability and uncertainty, leading to overconfident dependence on synthesized features, reduced robustness, and miscalibrated uncertainty estimates. To address these limitations, we propose PRA-PoE, an incomplete multimodal learning framework that is equipped with Prototype-anchored Representation Alignment (PRA) and an Uncertainty-aware Product of Experts (UA-PoE) fusion mechanism. First, PRA uses learnable global prototypes and missing-aware tokens to encode modality availability, distinguish observed from missing modalities, re-synthesize features for missing modalities, and adaptively refine observed representations to align latent spaces across modality subsets, with the goal of reducing representation shift under varying missingness patterns. Second, UA-PoE models each modality as a Gaussian expert and performs closed-form Product of Experts fusion, where experts with higher uncertainty are automatically down-weighted via lower precision, improving uncertainty reliability. We evaluate PRA-PoE under a clinically realistic protocol by training with naturally missing data and testing on all non-empty modality combinations. PRA-PoE consistently outperforms the state-of-the-art across datasets, achieving a 5.4% relative improvement in average accuracy on ADNI and a 10.9% relative gain in average Macro-F1 on OASIS-3 over the strongest baseline across all non-empty modality subsets.
Paper 2
■書誌情報
Guangqian Yang, Tong Ding, Wenlong Hou, Yue Xun, Ye Du, Qian Niu*, Shujun Wang*: BrainAnytime: Anatomy-Aware Cross-Modal Pretraining for Brain Image Analysis with Arbitrary Modality Availability, Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (MICCAI 2026), Early Accept, October 2026
■概要
Clinical diagnostic workups typically follow a modality escalation pathway: after initial clinical evaluation, clinicians begin with routine structural imaging (e.g., MRI), selectively add sequences such as FLAIR or T2 to refine the differential, and reserve molecular imaging (e.g., amyloid-PET) for cases that remain uncertain after standard evaluation. Consequently, patients are observed with heterogeneous and often incomplete modality subsets. However, most current AI models assume fixed data modalities as the model inputs. In this paper, we present BrainAnytime, a unified pretraining framework pretrained on 34,899 3D brain scans from five datasets that support brain image analysis under arbitrary modality availability spanning multi-sequence MRI and amyloid-PET. A single model accepts whatever imaging is available, from a lone T1 scan to a full multimodal workup. Pretraining learns structural-molecular correspondences between MRI and PET via cross-modal distillation (RCMD) and prioritizes disease-vulnerable anatomy via atlas-guided curriculum masking (PACM), all within a shared 3D masked autoencoder (Multi-MAE3D). Across four downstream tasks and five clinically motivated modality settings, BrainAnytime largely outperforms modality-specific models, missing-modality baselines, and large-scale brain MRI pretrained foundation models on most modality settings. Notably, it surpasses the strongest missing-modality baselines with relative improvements of 6.2% and 7.0% in average accuracy on CN vs. AD and CN vs. MCI classification, respectively.
